Tuesday, April 26, 2011

One to One Interaction

 

I recently realized that I become the most upset about something when I know that I am wrong.  Not wrong in the sense of 1+1=3, but wrong when compared to the moral and societal compulsions that I am obliged to follow.  I feel obligated to express my point and make others understand my train of thought—because I fear being mislabeled and the recourse of my conclusions.

Fear is compulsory, I cannot avoid it when I go through this thought process.  I have been subjected to so much additional stress in my life due to those infectious societal standards that I fear the judgment that I incur from being an outlier.  I have read 1984, Fahrenheit 451, The Fountainhead, and I have witnessed firsthand what fear and public discrimination can do to an individual.  I fear suppression of my thoughts, feeling, and actions above all other things.

I believe in freedom of segregation, preordained justice, and fear.  We live in a society that is on the brink of an outstanding turning point, and it is still fear that controls the populace.

“I must not fear.  Fear is the mind-killer.  Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.  I will face my fear.  I will permit it to pass over me and through me.  And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.  Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.  Only I will remain”        

                                                                     -Litany against fear

Friday, April 22, 2011

Irony

 

Today in class I had an interesting discussion that I felt like continuing here online.  The debate began noting the development of graphic novels through the last twenty years and went on to cover the evolution of print since the dawn of the internet.  The conversation touched upon several articles I had written in the past and I felt very well versed and prepared for something that I wouldn’t necessarily have great knowledge of.

If you look at the number of people who are out reading in today’s society , there is an extremely alarming increase in the number of readers thanks to the internet and other forms of digital technology in comparison to previous years.  However, this number is a false prophet when faced with obtaining epiphany.  Why?  There is an alarming decrease in the number of people who read literature— including fictional stories, nonfictions, biographies, or educational texts.

Most people go online and find nonfiction on Facebook, fiction from web comics, biographies on blogs, and textbooks on Wikipedia.  The amount of development that can take place in such a small article is negligible.  How can an author develop a deep protagonist, antagonist, and plot in such a small and short space?  How can the writings of Wikipedia compare to my textbook on Structural Analysis, or XKCD’s humor compare to that presented in the writing of Shakespeare?  Sure the information is easily accessible and readily available, but one could contest if the quantity makes up for the missing quality.

Is this necessarily bad?  Is it good?  Is it better to have an average society with a raised average bar but a smaller deviation from the norm?  Or is it better to have a lower average with extreme cases of intelligent individuals?